Osteogenesis Imperfecta: the Incurable Disorder

Many people may be familiar with the term “osteoporosis” – a systemic skeletal disorder that causes the deterioration of bone tissue and low bone mass, leading to bone fragility and a high fracture risk1. Upon hearing this name, memories of the elderly and old relatives may easily come to mind for many. Indeed, osteoporosis is more prevalent amongst the elderly, and becomes more common with age2.

However, in this blog post, we will shift away from the general disease and instead focus on a specific branch of osteoporosis: osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), better known as brittle bone disease.

Osteogenesis imperfecta is a group of rare inherited disorders of connective tissue, most commonly associated with excessive bone fragility caused by collagen mutations in genes3, first described by  Swedish physician Olof Jakob Ekman6. There are a wide range of symptoms, ranging from hearing loss, recurrent chronic pain in the abdomen and constipation to pulmonary and cardiovascular complications.

As scary as it sounds, OI is a rare genetic disease, and only affects one in 15,000 ~ 20,000 people4. Due to the variability and the number of genes involved (there are 19 distinct genes that can contribute to OI) in the disease, as of 2021, there are 21 types of the disease, classified by the genetic mutations an OI patient has.

The most common types of OI are types I, II, III and IV, summarised in the table below7:

TypeDescriptionGeneMode of inheritanceIncidence
Imild; collagen is of insufficient quantityNull COL1A1 geneAutosomal dominant, 34% de novo51/30,000
IIlethal in the perinatal period; collagen is fatally defective at C-terminusCOL1A2, COL1A2Autosomal dominant, ~100% de novo51/40,000 ~ 1/100,000
IIISevere, progressive and deforming; collagen quantity is insufficient but are of low quality COL1A1, COL1A2Autosomal dominant, 85% de novo51/60,000
IVvariable and deforming, but usually with normal sclerae; collagen quantity is sufficient but are of low qualityCOL1A1, COL1A2Autosomal dominant, 50% de novo51/30,000

One important thing to note about this disorder is that it currently has no known treatment, medicine or surgery8, as the condition is caused by mutating genes, and the field of gene editing has not yet advanced to the point where it can cure genetic diseases yet.

All is not lost, however, as there are many commercially available forms of medication that can prevent deformities and bone fractures, with the two most commonly used classes of drugs being bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibodies.

Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs typically used to treat osteoporosis via slowing down bone resorption9 and prevents osteoclasts from adhering onto the bone surface. However, there are a few documented cases that bisphosphonates may cause the osteonecrosis of the jaw, and along with bone, joint and/or muscle pain, the drug also affects kidney function10.

Before we go into the antibody treatment, we must first understand the mechanism of action of the antibody.

In humans, two types of specialsed cells regulate bone formation and resorption: osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The behaviour of normal osteoblasts (diagram on the left) begins when a Wnt protein binds to the N-terminal extracellular domain of a Frizzled (Fz) family receptor11. To facilitate the signalling process, other co-receptors may be required alongside the Fz receptor, such as the lipoprotein (LRP)-5/612. Upon the activation of LRP5/6, a signal is sent to other phosphoproteins within the cell cytoplasm from the Fz receptor.

Normally this is where the Wnt signalling pathway splits off into three different branches, but the one that concerns us the most is the canonical pathway.  It involves the accumulation of β-catenin, a dual-function protein involved in the regulation and coordination of gene transcription, in the cytoplasm.

Under most circumstances, β-catenin is degraded by a destruction complex composed of Axin, PP2A, GSK-3 and casein kinase 1α. However, once Wnt binds Fz and LRP5/6, the destruction complex is disrupted as Axin binds to LRP5/6 and becomes dephosphorylated. Other phosphoproteins in the cytoplasm will also inhibit GSK3 activity when this happens. This will allow β-catenin to accumulate and localise to the nucleus, inducing a cellular response13 alongside TCF/LEF (T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancing factor) transcription factors. In osteoblasts, this would ultimately end in an increase in bone formation.

Problems arise when sclerostin, a glycoprotein encoded by the SOST gene in humans, attaches to LRP5/6 receptors and disrupts this process14. Sclerostin is expressed in osteocytes and inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts. This is because once LRP5/6 is inactivated by sclerostin, the pathway cannot proceed, and will lead to the decline in β-catenin concentrations in the osteoblast, thereby reducing bone formation.

Although osteoblast activity is itself regulated by a negative feedback system by sclerostin as well as a whole host of other hormones and inhibitory factors, in OI patients, decreased osteoblast activity by the action of sclerostin is often the cause of improper or little to no COL1A1/2 gene expression in osteoblasts, causing OI.

It must be emphasized that sclersotin is not an “evil” protein; it merely serves as a regulator for osteoblast activity. If the SOST gene responsible for the encoding of sclerostin mutates, van Buchem disease and sclerosteosis disorders may result15.

The antibody mentioned earlier is called romosozumab16 (sold under the brand Evenity). In its clinical trials, the antibody binds to sclerostin and inactivates the protein, causing an increase in osteoblast activity via the canonical Wnt signaling pathway described above.

However, the antibody also imposed severe cardiac ischemic events during phase III clinical trials.

Due to the extremely high associated risks of heart attacks, strokes and death from cardiovascular diseases16, the drug was rejected several times by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as the European Medicines Agency. Although the drug was finally approved by both institutions16, 17, its tortuous experiences in applying for market authorization for postmenopausal osteoporosis remain proof of just how difficult it is to approve high-risk medication.

Note that cardiovascular diseases are already a staple in many OI patients, as a Danish study in 2016 has shown18.

After understanding the effects of current available treatments, it becomes easy to see why creating a second-generation sclerostin inhibitor is particularly desirable, both to treat osteogenesis imperfecta without increasing the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases in the process. There is also a growing cardiovascular concern for OI patients during sclerostin antibody treatment, especially for those with cardiovascular abnormalities or with cardiovascular diseases history.

iGEM Team HKBU 2021 has already developed an aptamer as an alternative sclerostin inhibitor that will selectively inhibit sclerostin in a way that will inactivate its ability to bind with LRP5/6 receptors, while simultaneously preserving sclerostin’s function as a cardiovascular regulator in the human body, and has received U.S. FDA Orphan Drug Designation.

References:

1 NIAMS, 2014. “Handout on health: Osteoporosis”.

2 World Health Organization, 2015. “Chronic rheumatic conditions”.

3 B.O. Edelu et al., 2014. “Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Case Report and Review of Literature”.

4 Forlino A, Marini JC (April 2016). “Osteogenesis imperfecta”.

5 Zhytnik L et al., 2019. “De novo and inherited pathogenic variants in collagen-related osteogenesis imperfecta”.

6 O. J. Ekman, 1788. “Descriptionem et casus aliquot osteomalaciae sistens”.

7 Sillence et al., 1979. “Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta”.

8 B. Lee, D. Krakow, 2019. “Osteogenesis Imperfecta Overview”.

9 G.A. Rodan, H.A. Fleisch, 1996. “Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action”.

10  S. Durham et al., 2010. “Bisphosphonate Nephrotoxicity Risks and Use in CKD Patients”.

11 T.P. Rao, M. Kühl, 2010 June. “An updated overview on Wnt signaling pathways: a prelude for more”.

12  Y. Komiya Y, R. Habas, 2008 April. “Wnt signal transduction pathways”,

13 B.T. MacDonald, K. Tamai, X. He, 2009 July. “Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases”.

14 X. Li, Y, Zhang, H, Kang, W. Liu, P. Liu, J. Zhang J, et al, 2005 May. “Sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling”.

15 R. L. Van Bezooijen et al., 2005. “Control of bone formation by osteocytes? Lessons from the rare skeletal disorders sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease”.

16 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019 April. “FDA approves new treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture”.

17 European Medicines Agency, 2020 Feb. “Evenity”.

18 L. Folkestad et al., 2016 Sept. “Cardiovascular disease in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta – a nationwide, register-based cohort study”.19 AMGEN, 2016 Nov. “Results From Phase 3 BRIDGE Study Show Romosozumab Significantly Increases Bone Mineral Density In Men With Osteoporosis”

Fernando Keung
+ posts
iGEM HKBU 2021
+ posts